Policy Instruments for Evolution of Bounded Rationality: Application to Climate-Energy Problems
نویسندگان
چکیده
We demonstrate how an evolutionary agent-based model can be used to evaluate climate policies that take the heterogeneity of strategies of individual agents into account. An essential feature of the model is that the fitness of an economic strategy is determined by the relative welfare of the associated agent as compared to its immediate neighbors in a social network. This enables the study of policies that affect relative positions of individuals. We formulate two innovative climate policies, namely prizes, altering directly relative welfare, and advertisement, which influences the social network of interactions. The policies are illustrated using a simple model of global warming where a resource with a negative environmental impact—fossil energy—can be replaced by an environmentally neutral yet less cost-effective alternative, namely renewable energy. It is shown that the general approach enlarges the scope of economic policy analysis.
منابع مشابه
The dilemma of Rationality or Providing Efficiency in Monetary Policy Making: An Application of Arrow’s
Financial frictions inducted in the model is a new contribution to monetary economics. Herein, an analytical tool arranges monetary policymaking in the form of two steps procedure. In the first step, an appropriate amount of money supply should be assessed; and in the second step, that appropriate amount should be allocated to several sectors. The Central Bank obligates the step of assessment a...
متن کاملFrom Rationalism Toward Humanity: Review of Notions Evolution in Urban Planning
By this time there has been a trend in the direction of devolvement in governance and planning. This trend presents a role for inhabitants, a considerable lot of whom have found an opportunity to express their interests for self-assurance; struggling that current governance structures do not satisfactorily outfit their needs and interests. As planning is inseparably connected to power, this fea...
متن کاملInnovative Use of the Law to Address Complex Global Health Problems; Comment on “The Legal Strength of International Health Instruments - What It Brings to Global Health Governance?”
Addressing the increasingly globalised determinants of many important problems affecting human health is a complex task requiring collective action. We suggest that part of the solution to addressing intractable global health issues indeed lies with the role of new legal instruments in the form of globally binding treaties, as described in the recent article of Nikogosian and Kickbusch. However...
متن کاملCoalitions Among Computationally Bounded Agents
This paper analyzes coalitions among self interested agents that need to solve combinatorial optimization problems to operate e ciently in the world By colluding coordinating their actions by solving a joint optimization prob lem the agents can sometimes save costs compared to operating individually A model of bounded rationality is adopted where computation resources are costly It is not worth...
متن کاملWelfare economics and bounded rationality: The case for model-based approaches∗
In this paper we examine the problems facing a policy maker who observes inconsistent choices made by agents who are boundedly rational. We contrast a model-less and a model-based approach to welfare economics. We make the case for the model-based approach and examine its advantages as well as some problematic issues associated with it. J.E.L. codes: B4, D03, D6.
متن کامل